Corrine Barber died on June 22, 2005. Her Will left the bulk of her estate to her youngest child, Alecia Holmes (fathered by Adams). When Alecia offered the Will for probate, Corrine’s four older children (fathered by Barber) filed a caveat. They contended the Will was invalid due to undue influence.

The probate court granted the caveat, effectively invalidating the Will. Alecia appealed to Superior Court where she filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. In arguing the Will was the product of undue influence, the Barber children argued that Holmes’ father (Adams) was abusive and that both Holmes and Adams had threatened Corrine, constantly harassed her, essentially forcing her to sign the Will. The undisputed evidence showed, however, that, at the time that Corrine executed her will, she was in her attorney’s office, accompanied only by her attorney and witnesses. Neither Adams nor Holmes was there for the execution ceremony. Before signing the document, Corrine represented that she understood the will and it reflected her wishes at that time.

In light of this evidence, the trial court found, the Barber Children’s testimony, at best, showed that Adams, who is not a beneficiary, exerted some level of influence over Corrine decades before she signed her will, but not at the time of its execution. The evidence fell short of showing any type of influence over Corrine at the time the will was signed. The Superior Court ruled in favor of Alecia, granting her motion. The Barber children appealed.

On appeal the court similarly found the evidence provided no valid proof of undue influence. To be sufficient to invalidate a will, undue influence must reach the level of deception or force and coercion operating on the [T]estat[rix] at the time of execution such that Corrine would have been deprived of her free agency. The decision below was affirmed.

http://www.gasupreme.us/pdf/s07a1353.pdf

Published by
David McGuffey

Recent Posts

Medicaid Post Eligibility Treatment of Income and Incurred Medical Expenses

After Medicaid eligibility is established, 42 C.F.R. § 435.725 addresses how income is treated. For…

7 days ago

Medicaid’s Refusal to Provide 24/7 Care in the Community Might be Discrimination

In Harrison v. Young (5th Cir. June 6, 2024), the Fifth Circuit considered Ms. Barbara…

3 weeks ago

Updates to Nursing Home Quality of Care Regulations

From time to time federal regulations covering nursing home quality of care are updated. Thus…

3 weeks ago

Federal Nursing Home Quality of Care Regulations

Nursing homes that accept Medicare or Medicaid are required to comply with quality of care…

3 weeks ago

New Article Discussing Medicaid Enrollment and Wealth Transfers

On June 11, 2024, the Gerontologist published an article on Medicaid enrollment and Intergenerational transfers…

4 weeks ago

Virtual Dementia Tour

Dementia affects more than 50 million people worldwide. The Virtual Dementia Tour is designed to…

4 weeks ago