Plaintiff filed suit for medical malpractice, negligence, violations of the Residents’ Rights Act and wrongful death. The complaint was personally served on Defendant’s agent on February 9, 2005. Defendant had 30 days to file an Answer. Without filing a request for extention, Defendant filed first answer 30 days too late. Plaintiff moved to strike the answer and for default. After hearing, the trial court found no justifiable excuse for failure to file a timely answer, granted the motion to strike and entered default judgment. “Appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in granting appellee’s motions because the late answer was the result of excusable neglect. Appellant admits that its agent for service of process forwarded the complaint to its legal department, where its receipt was verified, but argues that it was “unaware” of the lawsuit because the complaint was misplaced by appellant’s clerical help and was never received by appellant’s in-house counsel.” The argument was rejected. The court found that Beverly’s argument, even if its legal department was busy, could be viewed as negligent failure to secure adequate help rather than excusable neglect. See also Beverly Enters. – Ark., Inc. v. Jarrett, 2007 Ark. App. LEXIS 20 (Ark. Ct. App. 2007) (affirming judgment).