Cases

Bruner v. Timberlane Manor L.P., 2006 OK 90 (Okla. 2006)

Plaintiffs filed suit for negligence and wrongful death. The nursing home appeared specially and moved to dismiss or in the alternative to compel arbitration. The trial court denied the motion to compel arbitration. The nursing home argued that the Federal Arbitration Act applied because it received Medicare payments originating out of state, complied with Medicare and Medicare rules and regulations, purchased supplies from out of state and used instruments of interstate commerce such as telephones and the postal service. On appeal, the court found that the Federal Arbitration Act did not apply to the contract at issue and affirmed the trial court. The court declined to find that Congress intended funding under the Medicare and Medicaid programs to be indicative of interstate commerce. Instead, the transaction was found to be a “profoundly local transaction – in state nursing home care provided to an Oklahoma individual by an Oklahoma entity licensed under Oklahoma law.” Further, the agreement itself stated that it would be governed by Oklahoma law. The court then held that Oklahoma’s Nursing Home Care Act (a specific statute) governed over Oklahoma’s Uniform Arbitration Act (a general statute) in this case and upheld the decision below. Decided 12/12/2006.

Note: The court cites the CMS letter dated January 9, 2003, from the Director of Survey and Certification Group to Survey and Certification Group Regional Office Management. That letter, at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/downloads/SCLetter03-10.pdf, states that if a nursing home discharges or retaliates against an existing resident for failure to sign or comply with an arbitration agreement, then the State and Region may initiate an enforcement action based on a violation of the program rules governing discharge and transfer. Failure to execute a binding arbitration agreement is not a permitted reason for discharge or transfer. Further, the appeal procedures at 42 C.F.R. § 431.200 et seq. apply to discharges or disputes of eligibility between the resident and the State Medicaid Agency and are not affected by a binding arbitration agreement. This seemed to provide further support for the proposition that specific nursing home legislation and regulations override a general arbitration statute.

Published by
David McGuffey

Recent Posts

Are Video Wills Valid?

You might wonder whether you can make a video recording of yourself stating who gets…

3 days ago

2025 Georgia Medicaid Transfer Penalty

2025 Georgia Medicaid Transfer Penalty If an applicant for long-term care Medicaid (e.g., nursing home…

5 days ago

Another Scam, and this one makes my blood boil

Recently, my dad died. While I was driving back from being sworn in as his…

1 month ago

Review of Georgia Cases on Testamentary Capacity

In Georgia, an individual has legal capacity to make a Will "when the testator has…

2 months ago

Georgia Power of Attorney Act

Last updated 2/28/2025 The Georgia Power of Attorney Act was enacted in 2017 (HB 221)…

2 months ago

Due Process Limits State’s Power to Tax Out of State Trust

In North Carolina Department of Revenue v. The Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust, the…

2 months ago