Transfer Penalty Reversed Where Home Was Returned. Three months prior to a nursing home admission, a 98 year old Petitioner purchased her daughters home for $406,300, plus personal property valued at $26,775. She paid by transferring securities valued at $484,766.78, and $51,691.78 was returned to Petitioner as an over-payment. Petitioner’s alleged hope was that she could live with her daughter for the remainder of her life, with her daughter as her caregiver. In July, 2007, 9 days prior to applying for Medicaid, she transferred her home to her daughter as a caregiver child. The Court sustained DFCS’s objection to the caregiver child transfer, but after the hearing on that issue the home was re-conveyed to Petitioner and DFCS refused to remove the transfer penalty. The Court reversed. “When a transferred asset is transferred back to the A/R/, DFCS is required to void the transfer penalty and determine eligibility as if no transfer ever occurred.” This case was decided on cross-motions for Summary Determination.
OSAH-Gwinnett-Langston-7-2008.pdf (July 11, 2008).
The word disability doesn't have the same meaning in all contexts. If you have a…
On October 10, 2024, the Social Security Administration announced that Americans will increase a 2.5…
Many people think that estate planning is just having documents prepared. They have a lawyer…
In Chambers v. Edwards, 365 Ga. App. 482 (2022), William Chambers sued his sister, Kathy…
When an injured party sues someone who negligently injured him or her, one form of…
From time to time we re-post David Hultstrom's Financial Foundations. Mr. Hultstrom, who is a…