Resident was sexually assaulted in a mental health facility. Plaintiff brought an action alleging negligent hiring, gross negligence, sexual assault, sexual exploitation, and premises liability. No expert report was filed. Defendants argued the claims sounded in malpractice and moved to dismiss based on failure to file an expert report. Because the duty to protect the resident was premised on her vulnerability as a resident in the facility and the facility’s duty to protect her, the court concluded that the claim was a health care liability claim and reversed the trial court’s denial of the motion to dismiss. Decided July 27, 2006.
Many people want to know when they should apply for Social Security (assuming it still…
The Social Security Fairness Act was signed into law on January 5, 2025. Prior to…
If you follow Women's College Basketball, then you must have heard of Pat Summitt. Coach…
House Bill 1292 (HB 1292) now imposes new duties on Georgia Notaries effective January 1,…
If you are looking for assistance understanding Elder Law, a Certified Elder Law Attorney can…
Not everything goes through someone's probate estate. That means not everything passes through your Will.…