Federal regulations (42 C.F.R. § 483.60) provides that each resident receives and the facility must provide:

  • Food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance;
  • Food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature;
  • Food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs;
  • Food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences;
  • Appealing options of similar nutritive value to residents who choose not to eat food that is initially served or who request a different meal choice; and
  • Drinks, including water and other liquids consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.

Menus must:

  • Meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines.;
  • Be prepared in advance;
  • Be followed;
  • Reflect, based on a facility’s reasonable efforts, the religious, cultural, and ethnic needs of the resident population, as well as input received from residents and resident groups;
  • Be updated periodically;
  • Be reviewed by the facility’s dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional for nutritional adequacy; and
  • Nothing in this paragraph should be construed to limit the resident’s right to make personal dietary choices.

Each resident must receive and the facility must provide at least three meals daily, at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests, and plan of care.

There must be no more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day, except when a nourishing snack is served at bedtime, up to 16 hours may elapse between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day if a resident group agrees to this meal span.

Suitable, nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided to residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal service times, consistent with the resident plan of care.

Published by
David McGuffey

Recent Posts

Probate Court properly exercised its discretion disregarding spouse’s statutory priority as guardian

In In re Estate of Jenkins, 366 Ga. App. 628 (2023), Gary Jenkins was living…

1 week ago

Wrongful death case dismissed because wrong person filed complaint

In Garner v. Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc., 370 Ga. App. 146 (2023), Appellants alleged that…

1 week ago

Attorney’s fees can be awarded for frivolous claims and defenses in Probate Cases

The general rule is that "an award of attorney fees and expenses of litigation are…

1 week ago

How Georgia Courts should Interprete Laws

In Bell v. Hargrove, 313 Ga. 30 (2021), Bell applied for a weapons carry permit.…

2 weeks ago

Petitioner has burden of proof in showing the amount necessary for year’s support

In In re Dallas, 369 Ga. App. 553 (2023), the Probate Court denied a Petition…

2 weeks ago