Medicaid eligibility determinations must be based on “ascertainable standards.” See J. Perkins, Issue brief: Appeal Rights and Medicaid Benefits citing Holmes v. New York City Hous. Auth., 398 F.2d 262, 265 (2d Cir. 1968). In Holmes, in the context of housing authority decisions, the Court said “due process requires that selections among applicants be made in accordance with “ascertainable standards.” In fair hearings, decisions
must be based exclusively on evidence introduced at the hearing. Section 431.244(a).
In early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment (“EPSDT”) cases, the standard in evaluating whether services should be covered is whether the specific services are necessary to correct or ameliorate the Applicant’s physical condition. Freels, at 450. See also 42 U.S.C. § 1396d(r)(5).
After Medicaid eligibility is established, 42 C.F.R. § 435.725 addresses how income is treated. For…
In Harrison v. Young (5th Cir. June 6, 2024), the Fifth Circuit considered Ms. Barbara…
From time to time federal regulations covering nursing home quality of care are updated. Thus…
Nursing homes that accept Medicare or Medicaid are required to comply with quality of care…
On June 11, 2024, the Gerontologist published an article on Medicaid enrollment and Intergenerational transfers…
Dementia affects more than 50 million people worldwide. The Virtual Dementia Tour is designed to…