“Each participating State develops a plan containing reasonable standards . . . for determining eligibility for and the extent of medical assistance” within boundaries set by the Medicaid statute and the Secretary of Health and Human Services.” Wis. Dep’t of Health & Family Servs v. Blumer, 534 U.S. 473 (2002) (quoting Schweiker v. Gray Panthers, 453 U.S. 34, 36-37 (1981)); see also ABC Home Health Servs. v. Ga. Dep’t of Medical Assistance, 211 Ga. App. 461, 462 (1993). Although States must comply with federal law, each State has significant power to customize its Medicaid program within those parameters. Where federal law is silent, State law can generally fill the interstices so long as States do not violate federal statutes, regulations or rules. See Blumer, supra, at 496 (“we have not been reluctant to leave a range of permissible choices to the States, at least where the superintending federal agency has concluded that such latitude is consistent with the statute’s aims”). Nonetheless, the case law makes it clear that States often go beyond filling the gaps, ignoring federal law, in their efforts to expand collections.
Each State participating in the Medicaid program must develop a State Plan. 42 U.S.C. § 1396a. Among other requirements, the State plan must:
The word disability doesn't have the same meaning in all contexts. If you have a…
On October 10, 2024, the Social Security Administration announced that Americans will increase a 2.5…
Many people think that estate planning is just having documents prepared. They have a lawyer…
In Chambers v. Edwards, 365 Ga. App. 482 (2022), William Chambers sued his sister, Kathy…
When an injured party sues someone who negligently injured him or her, one form of…
From time to time we re-post David Hultstrom's Financial Foundations. Mr. Hultstrom, who is a…