The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendant, finding that the statute of limitations had run. The Court of appeals reversed the trial court’s ruling in January, 2006 after finding that disability tolls the statute of limitations notwithstanding the existence of a durable power of attorney. On appeal, the defendants argued the that the agent, Terry Sullivan, had power to commence the action that, thus, the statute was not tolled. After examining the language of the statute and the relevant case law, the Supreme Court found that Terry Sullivan was not “the person entitled to commence an action” within the meaning of the Tolling Statute. The person “entitled to commence an action” is more than just a person who has the authority to bring an action. The term clearly refers to the person who is under the disability, who suffered the legal wrong, and to whom the claim belongs.
The court expressly rejected the Defendant’s argument that there is no disability and that tolling does not apply while a durable power of attorney exists.
Decided April 24, 2007. Opinion at: http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/OPINIONS/TSC/PDF/072/SullivantOPN.pdf
Before a guardian or the personal representative of an estate takes office, he or she…
In Georgia, when actions are filed in Probate Court, some people must be notified before…
What is Form 1041 used for? If an estate or trust has gross income of…
IRS Form 56 is used to notify the IRS of the creation or termination of…
On November 15, 2024, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services posted the 2025 spousal…
The word disability doesn't have the same meaning in all contexts. If you have a…